{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","provider_url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my","title":"JUDICIAL REVIEW \u2013 PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND LOCUS STANDI | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"l0QKDhJpqS\"><a href=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/judicial-review-procedural-fairness-and-locus-standi\/\">JUDICIAL REVIEW \u2013 PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND LOCUS STANDI<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/judicial-review-procedural-fairness-and-locus-standi\/embed\/#?secret=l0QKDhJpqS\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;JUDICIAL REVIEW \u2013 PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND LOCUS STANDI&#8221; &#8212; Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" data-secret=\"l0QKDhJpqS\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/judicalreview24.jpg","thumbnail_width":1200,"thumbnail_height":630,"description":"This excerpt illuminates the foundational principles of judicial review as outlined in Order 53 of the Rules of Court 2012. It highlights the criteria for challenging public decisions on grounds of illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety. Central to the discussion is the question of timing in judicial review applications, particularly in cases of procedural unfairness. The practical scenario underscores the significance of a \"decision\" by the relevant authority as a prerequisite for locus standi, drawing insights from the case of Hisham bin Halim v Maya bt Ahmad Fuad & Ors [2023] 12 MLJ 714."}