{"id":5707,"date":"2024-12-16T09:01:25","date_gmt":"2024-12-16T01:01:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?p=5707"},"modified":"2024-12-16T09:01:27","modified_gmt":"2024-12-16T01:01:27","slug":"companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/","title":{"rendered":"COMPANIES ACT &#8211; OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Summary and Facts<\/strong><br>A, a 50% shareholder, had been uninvolved in the company\u2019s management for years. Meanwhile, B (the chairman) and C (a director) ran the business. The company owned valuable trademarks central to its operations, but in 2018, B secretly transferred these trademarks to D, a competing company tied to B and his daughter, for just RM10. The transfer lacked board approval and blindsided A.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Feeling sidelined and harmed, A filed an oppression action under Section 346, claiming that B\u2019s actions were unfair and disregarded her rights as a shareholder. She sought a buyout of her shares. B and C countered, arguing the harm was corporate, affecting the company and all shareholders equally, and should be pursued as a derivative action under Section 347.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Legal Issues<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Whether the harm was personal or corporate?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether the action should have been an oppression or derivative action?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Whether reflective loss barred the claim?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Court Findings<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The Federal Court found that the wrongful transfer of trademarks caused harm to the company as a whole, not to A personally. The injury was shared equally by all shareholders, making it a corporate injury rather than personal oppression.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A incorrectly pursued an oppression action under Section 346. The appropriate remedy for corporate harm was a derivative action under Section 347, as the company, not A, was the proper plaintiff.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A\u2019s claims of reduced share value and lost dividends constituted reflective loss, arising from harm to the company. Such claims cannot form the basis for an oppression action.<\/li>\n<\/ul>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a decisive ruling, the Federal Court clarified the boundaries between personal shareholder oppression and corporate harm, overturning the Court of Appeal\u2019s findings. The Court held that claims tied to the wrongful transfer of trademarks belonged to the company, not the individual shareholder, reaffirming that corporate harm must be addressed through a derivative action rather than an oppression claim.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5708,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1570],"tags":[2251],"class_list":["post-5707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-company-law","tag-company-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>COMPANIES ACT - OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In a decisive ruling, the Federal Court clarified the boundaries between personal shareholder oppression and corporate harm, overturning the Court of Appeal\u2019s findings. The Court held that claims tied to the wrongful transfer of trademarks belonged to the company, not the individual shareholder, reaffirming that corporate harm must be addressed through a derivative action rather than an oppression claim.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ms_MY\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"COMPANIES ACT - OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a decisive ruling, the Federal Court clarified the boundaries between personal shareholder oppression and corporate harm, overturning the Court of Appeal\u2019s findings. The Court held that claims tied to the wrongful transfer of trademarks belonged to the company, not the individual shareholder, reaffirming that corporate harm must be addressed through a derivative action rather than an oppression claim.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-12-16T01:01:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-12-16T01:01:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/opression.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minit\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\"},\"headline\":\"COMPANIES ACT &#8211; OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-16T01:01:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-16T01:01:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":262,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/opression.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"company law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Company Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/\",\"name\":\"COMPANIES ACT - OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/opression.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2024-12-16T01:01:25+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-12-16T01:01:27+00:00\",\"description\":\"In a decisive ruling, the Federal Court clarified the boundaries between personal shareholder oppression and corporate harm, overturning the Court of Appeal\u2019s findings. The Court held that claims tied to the wrongful transfer of trademarks belonged to the company, not the individual shareholder, reaffirming that corporate harm must be addressed through a derivative action rather than an oppression claim.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/opression.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/12\\\/opression.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"COMPANIES ACT &#8211; OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"description\":\"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"width\":2080,\"height\":369,\"caption\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/yhalaw\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\",\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"COMPANIES ACT - OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"In a decisive ruling, the Federal Court clarified the boundaries between personal shareholder oppression and corporate harm, overturning the Court of Appeal\u2019s findings. The Court held that claims tied to the wrongful transfer of trademarks belonged to the company, not the individual shareholder, reaffirming that corporate harm must be addressed through a derivative action rather than an oppression claim.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/","og_locale":"ms_MY","og_type":"article","og_title":"COMPANIES ACT - OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","og_description":"In a decisive ruling, the Federal Court clarified the boundaries between personal shareholder oppression and corporate harm, overturning the Court of Appeal\u2019s findings. The Court held that claims tied to the wrongful transfer of trademarks belonged to the company, not the individual shareholder, reaffirming that corporate harm must be addressed through a derivative action rather than an oppression claim.","og_url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/","og_site_name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw","article_published_time":"2024-12-16T01:01:25+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-12-16T01:01:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/opression.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"YHA Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"YHA Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minit"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/"},"author":{"name":"YHA Admin","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef"},"headline":"COMPANIES ACT &#8211; OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS","datePublished":"2024-12-16T01:01:25+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-16T01:01:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/"},"wordCount":262,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/opression.jpg","keywords":["company law"],"articleSection":["Company Law"],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/","name":"COMPANIES ACT - OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/opression.jpg","datePublished":"2024-12-16T01:01:25+00:00","dateModified":"2024-12-16T01:01:27+00:00","description":"In a decisive ruling, the Federal Court clarified the boundaries between personal shareholder oppression and corporate harm, overturning the Court of Appeal\u2019s findings. The Court held that claims tied to the wrongful transfer of trademarks belonged to the company, not the individual shareholder, reaffirming that corporate harm must be addressed through a derivative action rather than an oppression claim.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ms-MY","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/opression.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/opression.jpg","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/companies-act-oppression-drawing-the-line-federal-court-defines-oppression-vs-corporate-harms\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"COMPANIES ACT &#8211; OPPRESSION \u2013 DRAWING THE LINE: FEDERAL COURT DEFINES OPPRESSION VS. CORPORATE HARMS"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization","name":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","width":2080,"height":369,"caption":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef","name":"YHA Admin","sameAs":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5707"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5707"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5707\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5709,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5707\/revisions\/5709"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5708"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}