{"id":5860,"date":"2025-11-15T15:46:45","date_gmt":"2025-11-15T07:46:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?p=5860"},"modified":"2025-11-15T15:46:54","modified_gmt":"2025-11-15T07:46:54","slug":"illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/","title":{"rendered":"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT &#8211; RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>1. Summary and Facts<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v Port Kelang Authority [2025] 2 MLJ 238, the Federal Court considered whether the Supplemental Agreement for Additional Development Works (\u201cADW2\u201d), executed on 26.4.2006, was legally valid despite allegedly lacking consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Port Klang Authority (\u201cPKA\u201d) appointed Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (\u201cKDSB\u201d) as the turnkey contractor for the Port Klang Free Zone (\u201cPKFZ\u201d) project. Among several agreements, ADW1 set the interest rate at 5% per annum. ADW2 was entered into later, increasing the interest rate to 7.5% p.a., resulting in an additional RM49.367 million in payment to KDSB.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>KDSB argued that ADW2 was supported by consideration in the form of financial strain they undertook to fund both ADW1 and a newly signed agreement (\u201cNADW\u201d). PKA contended that ADW2 was void for want of consideration under Section 26 of the Contracts Act 1950 (\u201cCA 1950\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>2. Legal issues<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 Whether consideration must be found within the four corners of the agreement, or can extrinsic evidence be admitted?<br>\u2022 Whether the \u201cpractical benefit\u201d test from Williams v Roffey applies in Malaysia?<br>\u2022 Whether an agreement variation be enforceable even without fresh consideration, simply because parties acted upon it?<br>\u2022 Whether doctrine of estoppel validate an agreement that lacks consideration?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>3. Court Findings<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 The Court held that ADW2 lacked valid consideration. It found no express or implied reference in ADW2 to NADW, nor was there any real financial burden proven by KDSB, as financing had been secured through SPVs (VVB and FZCB) well in advance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 Extrinsic evidence was inadmissible, as KDSB did not satisfy the requirements of Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act 1950. The letter KDSB relied upon (dated 19.4.2006) did not prove any link between ADW2 and NADW.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 The \u201cpractical benefit\u201d test in Williams v Roffey Bros was explicitly rejected as applicable Malaysian law. The Court emphasised that it was inconsistent with long-established principles and had not been adopted in Malaysia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 Variation of a contract must still meet the essential requirement of consideration. Since ADW2 was a separate agreement, it had to stand on its own. The Court held that even if ADW2 was a variation, it still required fresh consideration, which was absent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 The Court held that estoppel cannot override statute. The payment made by PKA under ADW2 (in July 2011) was made under protest and after proceedings had commenced. Thus, it could not amount to a waiver or create enforceability under estoppel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>4. Practical Implications<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>This decision reinforces that contractual variations in Malaysia must be supported by clear and express consideration within the contract. The court\u2019s refusal to apply the practical benefit doctrine confirms that traditional contract principles remain intact. Estoppel cannot be invoked to save an agreement that is void for illegality or lack of consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v Port Kelang Authority [2025] 2 MLJ 238, the Federal Court reaffirmed a core principle of contract law &#8211; no consideration, no contract. The Court held that the supplemental agreement (ADW2), which increased interest payable by RM49 million, was void for want of consideration, despite being acted upon. Notably, the Court rejected the &#8220;practical benefit&#8221; doctrine from Williams v Roffey, clarifying that Malaysian law continues to uphold traditional consideration requirements. Estoppel, too, could not rescue the agreement. This case sends a clear message: contractual variations must be backed by clear and enforceable consideration, or risk being struck down.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5862,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-updates"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT - RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID? | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v Port Kelang Authority [2025] 2 MLJ 238, the Federal Court reaffirmed a core principle of contract law - no consideration, no contract. The Court held that the supplemental agreement (ADW2), which increased interest payable by RM49 million, was void for want of consideration, despite being acted upon. Notably, the Court rejected the &quot;practical benefit&quot; doctrine from Williams v Roffey, clarifying that Malaysian law continues to uphold traditional consideration requirements. Estoppel, too, could not rescue the agreement. This case sends a clear message: contractual variations must be backed by clear and enforceable consideration, or risk being struck down.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ms_MY\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT - RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID? | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v Port Kelang Authority [2025] 2 MLJ 238, the Federal Court reaffirmed a core principle of contract law - no consideration, no contract. The Court held that the supplemental agreement (ADW2), which increased interest payable by RM49 million, was void for want of consideration, despite being acted upon. Notably, the Court rejected the &quot;practical benefit&quot; doctrine from Williams v Roffey, clarifying that Malaysian law continues to uphold traditional consideration requirements. Estoppel, too, could not rescue the agreement. This case sends a clear message: contractual variations must be backed by clear and enforceable consideration, or risk being struck down.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T07:46:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T07:46:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/illegality-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minit\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\"},\"headline\":\"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT &#8211; RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID?\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T07:46:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T07:46:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":456,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/illegality-1.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Updates\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/\",\"name\":\"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT - RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID? | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/illegality-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T07:46:45+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T07:46:54+00:00\",\"description\":\"In Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v Port Kelang Authority [2025] 2 MLJ 238, the Federal Court reaffirmed a core principle of contract law - no consideration, no contract. The Court held that the supplemental agreement (ADW2), which increased interest payable by RM49 million, was void for want of consideration, despite being acted upon. Notably, the Court rejected the \\\"practical benefit\\\" doctrine from Williams v Roffey, clarifying that Malaysian law continues to uphold traditional consideration requirements. Estoppel, too, could not rescue the agreement. This case sends a clear message: contractual variations must be backed by clear and enforceable consideration, or risk being struck down.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/illegality-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/illegality-1.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT &#8211; RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"description\":\"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"width\":2080,\"height\":369,\"caption\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/yhalaw\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\",\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT - RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID? | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"In Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v Port Kelang Authority [2025] 2 MLJ 238, the Federal Court reaffirmed a core principle of contract law - no consideration, no contract. The Court held that the supplemental agreement (ADW2), which increased interest payable by RM49 million, was void for want of consideration, despite being acted upon. Notably, the Court rejected the \"practical benefit\" doctrine from Williams v Roffey, clarifying that Malaysian law continues to uphold traditional consideration requirements. Estoppel, too, could not rescue the agreement. This case sends a clear message: contractual variations must be backed by clear and enforceable consideration, or risk being struck down.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/","og_locale":"ms_MY","og_type":"article","og_title":"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT - RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID? | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","og_description":"In Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v Port Kelang Authority [2025] 2 MLJ 238, the Federal Court reaffirmed a core principle of contract law - no consideration, no contract. The Court held that the supplemental agreement (ADW2), which increased interest payable by RM49 million, was void for want of consideration, despite being acted upon. Notably, the Court rejected the \"practical benefit\" doctrine from Williams v Roffey, clarifying that Malaysian law continues to uphold traditional consideration requirements. Estoppel, too, could not rescue the agreement. This case sends a clear message: contractual variations must be backed by clear and enforceable consideration, or risk being struck down.","og_url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/","og_site_name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw","article_published_time":"2025-11-15T07:46:45+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-15T07:46:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/illegality-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"YHA Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"YHA Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minit"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/"},"author":{"name":"YHA Admin","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef"},"headline":"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT &#8211; RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID?","datePublished":"2025-11-15T07:46:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T07:46:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/"},"wordCount":456,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/illegality-1.jpg","articleSection":["Updates"],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/","name":"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT - RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID? | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/illegality-1.jpg","datePublished":"2025-11-15T07:46:45+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T07:46:54+00:00","description":"In Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd v Port Kelang Authority [2025] 2 MLJ 238, the Federal Court reaffirmed a core principle of contract law - no consideration, no contract. The Court held that the supplemental agreement (ADW2), which increased interest payable by RM49 million, was void for want of consideration, despite being acted upon. Notably, the Court rejected the \"practical benefit\" doctrine from Williams v Roffey, clarifying that Malaysian law continues to uphold traditional consideration requirements. Estoppel, too, could not rescue the agreement. This case sends a clear message: contractual variations must be backed by clear and enforceable consideration, or risk being struck down.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ms-MY","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/illegality-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/illegality-1.jpg","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/illegality-and-contract-rm49-million-mistake-adw2-struck-down-for-no-consideration-dimensi-sdn-bhd-legally-valid\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ILLEGALITY AND CONTRACT &#8211; RM49 MILLION MISTAKE? ADW2 STRUCK DOWN FOR NO CONSIDERATION DIMENSI SDN BHD LEGALLY VALID?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization","name":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","width":2080,"height":369,"caption":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef","name":"YHA Admin","sameAs":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5860"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5860"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5860\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5863,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5860\/revisions\/5863"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5862"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}