{"id":5864,"date":"2025-11-15T15:57:23","date_gmt":"2025-11-15T07:57:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?p=5864"},"modified":"2025-11-15T15:57:28","modified_gmt":"2025-11-15T07:57:28","slug":"tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/","title":{"rendered":"TORT OF DEFAMATION – NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

1. Summary and Facts<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In Lim Guan Eng v Datuk Tan Teik Cheng & Anor [2025] 2 MLJ 791, the Court of Appeal addressed a defamation suit filed by the appellant, Lim Guan Eng, against Datuk Tan Teik Cheng (R1) and The Star Online (R2).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On 7.3.2022, The Star Online published a \u201cLetter to the Editor\u201d authored by R1, then Vice-President of MCA. The article alleged, among other things, that Lim had politicised Chinese education and claimed to allocate RM4 million to SJKC Kuek Ho Yao during the Johor State Election campaign \u2013 allegedly with a condition to rename the school. The article ended with a question: \u201cWhen will he come out to explain this matter?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Lim Guan Eng claimed the statements were defamatory and sought RM5 million in damages. The High Court dismissed the claim. Lim appealed to the Court of Appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Legal issues<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 Whether the article, in its natural and ordinary meaning, was defamatory of the appellant.
\u2022 Whether the defences of fair comment, justification, and reportage applied.
\u2022 Whether the statements were published with malice, which would defeat any available defence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Court Findings<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 The Court of Appeal unanimously upheld the High Court\u2019s decision, ruled that the statements were not defamatory when read in context. They were inquiries seeking clarification, does not amount to misconduct.
\u2022 When read as a whole, the article did not carry a defamatory meaning. It called for clarification rather than making a direct accusation. The final sentence, inviting an explanation from Lim, diluted any defamatory sting.
\u2022 The Court found the article to be an expression of opinion on a matter of public interest. The statements were based on facts known to the public at the time and constituted views that a fair-minded person could honestly hold. The defence of fair comment was successfully established.
\u2022 The Star Online was entitled to rely on the defence of reportage. The article was published in a neutral and disinterested manner, clearly attributed to R1, and without editorial endorsement. The article was placed in the \u201cLetters to the Editor\u201d section, allowing space for public response \u2013 including from Lim himself.
\u2022 The Court rejected the argument that political rivalry alone established malice. R1 had made prior inquiries and genuinely believed in what he wrote. There was no evidence of recklessness or dishonesty in the publication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Practical Implications<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

This decision reinforces several key principles in defamation law. A statement that invites clarification \u2014 even if critical \u2014 may not be defamatory when fairly expressed. Fair comment remains a robust defence if the opinion is honest and grounded in fact. Reportage protects publishers reporting on ongoing public controversies, provided the report is neutral and does not adopt the allegations. Malice must be proven with more than political animosity \u2014 there must be evidence of dishonesty or bad faith.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Lim Guan Eng v Datuk Tan Teik Cheng & Anor [2025] 2 MLJ 791, the Court of Appeal dismissed a defamation claim over a politically charged article alleging conditions tied to a RM4 million school allocation. The Court ruled that the statements – framed as a call for explanation – were not defamatory when read in full context. The defendants successfully relied on the defences of fair comment and reportage, with the Court emphasising that political commentary, if rooted in fact and honestly held, remains protected speech – even during an election campaign. Malice was not proven, and the article\u2019s publication in a neutral \u201cLetters to the Editor\u201d section further insulated the publisher from liability.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5868,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-updates"],"yoast_head":"\nTORT OF DEFAMATION - NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED | Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Lim Guan Eng v Datuk Tan Teik Cheng & Anor [2025] 2 MLJ 791, the Court of Appeal dismissed a defamation claim over a politically charged article alleging conditions tied to a RM4 million school allocation. The Court ruled that the statements - framed as a call for explanation - were not defamatory when read in full context. The defendants successfully relied on the defences of fair comment and reportage, with the Court emphasising that political commentary, if rooted in fact and honestly held, remains protected speech - even during an election campaign. Malice was not proven, and the article\u2019s publication in a neutral \u201cLetters to the Editor\u201d section further insulated the publisher from liability.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ms_MY\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"TORT OF DEFAMATION - NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED | Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Lim Guan Eng v Datuk Tan Teik Cheng & Anor [2025] 2 MLJ 791, the Court of Appeal dismissed a defamation claim over a politically charged article alleging conditions tied to a RM4 million school allocation. The Court ruled that the statements - framed as a call for explanation - were not defamatory when read in full context. The defendants successfully relied on the defences of fair comment and reportage, with the Court emphasising that political commentary, if rooted in fact and honestly held, remains protected speech - even during an election campaign. Malice was not proven, and the article\u2019s publication in a neutral \u201cLetters to the Editor\u201d section further insulated the publisher from liability.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T07:57:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T07:57:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/defa-3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minit\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\"},\"headline\":\"TORT OF DEFAMATION – NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T07:57:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T07:57:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":467,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/defa-3.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Updates\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/\",\"name\":\"TORT OF DEFAMATION - NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED | Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/defa-3.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T07:57:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T07:57:28+00:00\",\"description\":\"In Lim Guan Eng v Datuk Tan Teik Cheng & Anor [2025] 2 MLJ 791, the Court of Appeal dismissed a defamation claim over a politically charged article alleging conditions tied to a RM4 million school allocation. The Court ruled that the statements - framed as a call for explanation - were not defamatory when read in full context. The defendants successfully relied on the defences of fair comment and reportage, with the Court emphasising that political commentary, if rooted in fact and honestly held, remains protected speech - even during an election campaign. Malice was not proven, and the article\u2019s publication in a neutral \u201cLetters to the Editor\u201d section further insulated the publisher from liability.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/defa-3.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/defa-3.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"TORT OF DEFAMATION – NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"description\":\"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"width\":2080,\"height\":369,\"caption\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/yhalaw\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\",\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"TORT OF DEFAMATION - NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED | Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"In Lim Guan Eng v Datuk Tan Teik Cheng & Anor [2025] 2 MLJ 791, the Court of Appeal dismissed a defamation claim over a politically charged article alleging conditions tied to a RM4 million school allocation. The Court ruled that the statements - framed as a call for explanation - were not defamatory when read in full context. The defendants successfully relied on the defences of fair comment and reportage, with the Court emphasising that political commentary, if rooted in fact and honestly held, remains protected speech - even during an election campaign. Malice was not proven, and the article\u2019s publication in a neutral \u201cLetters to the Editor\u201d section further insulated the publisher from liability.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/","og_locale":"ms_MY","og_type":"article","og_title":"TORT OF DEFAMATION - NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED | Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","og_description":"In Lim Guan Eng v Datuk Tan Teik Cheng & Anor [2025] 2 MLJ 791, the Court of Appeal dismissed a defamation claim over a politically charged article alleging conditions tied to a RM4 million school allocation. The Court ruled that the statements - framed as a call for explanation - were not defamatory when read in full context. The defendants successfully relied on the defences of fair comment and reportage, with the Court emphasising that political commentary, if rooted in fact and honestly held, remains protected speech - even during an election campaign. Malice was not proven, and the article\u2019s publication in a neutral \u201cLetters to the Editor\u201d section further insulated the publisher from liability.","og_url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/","og_site_name":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw","article_published_time":"2025-11-15T07:57:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-15T07:57:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/defa-3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"YHA Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"YHA Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minit"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/"},"author":{"name":"YHA Admin","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef"},"headline":"TORT OF DEFAMATION – NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED","datePublished":"2025-11-15T07:57:23+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T07:57:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/"},"wordCount":467,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/defa-3.jpg","articleSection":["Updates"],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/","name":"TORT OF DEFAMATION - NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED | Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/defa-3.jpg","datePublished":"2025-11-15T07:57:23+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T07:57:28+00:00","description":"In Lim Guan Eng v Datuk Tan Teik Cheng & Anor [2025] 2 MLJ 791, the Court of Appeal dismissed a defamation claim over a politically charged article alleging conditions tied to a RM4 million school allocation. The Court ruled that the statements - framed as a call for explanation - were not defamatory when read in full context. The defendants successfully relied on the defences of fair comment and reportage, with the Court emphasising that political commentary, if rooted in fact and honestly held, remains protected speech - even during an election campaign. Malice was not proven, and the article\u2019s publication in a neutral \u201cLetters to the Editor\u201d section further insulated the publisher from liability.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ms-MY","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/defa-3.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/defa-3.jpg","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/tort-of-defamation-no-malice-no-defamation-political-commentary-stands-protected\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"TORT OF DEFAMATION – NO MALICE, NO DEFAMATION: POLITICAL COMMENTARY STANDS PROTECTED"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","name":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization","name":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","width":2080,"height":369,"caption":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef","name":"YHA Admin","sameAs":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5864"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5864"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5864\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5869,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5864\/revisions\/5869"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5868"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}