{"id":5880,"date":"2025-11-15T17:47:37","date_gmt":"2025-11-15T09:47:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?p=5880"},"modified":"2025-11-15T17:47:57","modified_gmt":"2025-11-15T09:47:57","slug":"admiralty-in-rem-no-right-to-arrest-malaysian-court-blocks-abuse-of-admiralty-law-over-u-s-sanctions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/admiralty-in-rem-no-right-to-arrest-malaysian-court-blocks-abuse-of-admiralty-law-over-u-s-sanctions\/","title":{"rendered":"ADMIRALTY IN REM – NO RIGHT TO ARREST: MALAYSIAN COURT BLOCKS ABUSE OF ADMIRALTY LAW OVER U.S. SANCTIONS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

1. Summary and Facts<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In Unicious Energy Pte Ltd v The Owners of the \u2018Alpine Mathilde\u2019 [2023] MLJU 2819, the Plaintiff commenced an admiralty in rem action to arrest the vessel Alpine Mathilde as security for a London arbitration claim, alleging breach of a Voyage Charter Party. The arrest followed an earlier failed attempt by a related entity, Desert Oasis, to claim the same cargo under a sham sale. The Plaintiff had been designated an SDN under U.S. sanctions, rendering the cargo \u201cBlocked Property\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2. Legal Issues<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 Whether the Defendant was a \u201cU.S. Person\u201d under OFAC sanctions and thus prohibited from delivering the cargo.
\u2022 Whether the Plaintiff had a valid cause of action.
\u2022 Whether the arrest was a proper exercise of admiralty jurisdiction or a wrongful attempt to obtain arbitration security.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

3. Court\u2019s Findings<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

\u2022 The Defendant was held to be a \u201cU.S. Person\u201d under U.S. regulations and lawfully refused delivery of the \u201cBlocked Property\u201d.
\u2022 The Plaintiff, having breached the sanctions clause and no longer holding the Bills of Lading, had no cause of action.
\u2022 The arrest was an abuse of process. It was filed solely to obtain security for arbitration, without invoking section 11(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act 2005, and was therefore set aside.
\u2022 The Court allowed the Defendant to discharge and sell the cargo under a valid OFAC licence, and restrained the Plaintiff from further interference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Practical Implications<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Admiralty arrests for arbitration claims must comply with section 11(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act 2005 and are not available as of right under standard in rem jurisdiction. Sanctions clauses are enforceable, and foreign sanctions law will be considered as fact by Malaysian courts. Improper arrests based on sham transactions or lack of disclosure may be set aside with costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Unicious Energy Pte Ltd v The Owners of the \u2018Alpine Mathilde\u2019 [2023] MLJU 2819, the High Court set aside a vessel arrest brought solely to secure arbitration claims, holding it was an abuse of admiralty jurisdiction. The Plaintiff, an OFAC-designated SDN, had no valid claim due to U.S. sanctions, and the Court ruled that arrest for arbitration must strictly comply with section 11(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act 2005. This case reinforces the limits of in rem jurisdiction and the enforceability of sanctions clauses in cross-border charterparty disputes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5884,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1576],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-admiralty"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5880"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5880"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5880\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5885,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5880\/revisions\/5885"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5884"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}