{"id":5894,"date":"2025-11-15T23:28:38","date_gmt":"2025-11-15T15:28:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?p=5894"},"modified":"2025-11-15T23:28:40","modified_gmt":"2025-11-15T15:28:40","slug":"personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/","title":{"rendered":"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT &#8211; TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>1. Summary and Facts<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Genting Malaysia Bhd [2025] 2 MLJ 822, the Court of Appeal considered the legality of a data disclosure request by the Director General of Inland Revenue (\u201cDGIR\u201d) and the implications of the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (\u201cPDPA\u201d) on such requests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Genting Malaysia Bhd, which operates a large-scale resort and customer loyalty programme, was requested by the DGIR to disclose personal data of its loyalty cardholders to assist in income tax profiling. Genting refused, citing protection under the PDPA. The DGIR then sought clarification from the Personal Data Protection Commissioner (\u201cPPDP\u201d), who confirmed via a letter that disclosure was permissible under Section 39(b)(ii) of the PDPA and Section 81 of the Income Tax Act 1967 (\u201cITA\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Relying on this, DGIR forwarded the PPDP&#8217;s letter to Genting. In response, Genting initiated judicial review proceedings, seeking to quash both the PPDP\u2019s confirmation letter and DGIR\u2019s follow-up email. The High Court granted the judicial review, holding that the request for personal data contravened the PDPA and the right to privacy. DGIR appealed against this decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>2. Legal Issues<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 Whether the DGIR\u2019s forwarding email constituted a reviewable decision under Order 53 Rule 2(4) of the Rules of Court 2012.<br>\u2022 Whether Genting\u2019s judicial review application was time-barred under Order 53 Rule 3(6).<br>\u2022 Whether the DGIR\u2019s request for personal data fell within the scope of Section 81 of the ITA.<br>\u2022 Whether compliance with Section 81 ITA would amount to a breach of the PDPA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>3. Court\u2019s Findings<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 The Court of Appeal allowed the DGIR\u2019s appeal and overturned the High Court\u2019s decision.<br>\u2022 The Court ruled that DGIR\u2019s email forwarding the PPDP\u2019s letter was not a decision that altered Genting\u2019s legal rights or obligations, and therefore did not meet the threshold of a reviewable decision under judicial review.<br>\u2022 The Court further found that the judicial review application was time-barred, as it was filed significantly outside the three-month window prescribed by Order 53 Rule 3(6). The latest relevant correspondence was dated 13 May 2019, while the application was only filed on 7 February 2020.<br>\u2022 Due to the above jurisdictional findings, the Court did not address the substantive issue of whether the request breached the PDPA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>4. Practical Implications<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>This case highlights two key takeaways: First, not all government communications are subject to judicial review \u2014 only those that legally affect rights or obligations. Second, strict timelines apply; judicial review must be filed within three months, or it risks dismissal regardless of merit. For companies like Genting, it\u2019s a reminder to act swiftly when challenging regulatory demands, especially involving personal data.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Genting Malaysia Bhd [2025] 2 MLJ 822, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling that had favoured Genting&#8217;s resistance to a personal data disclosure request. The appeal succeeded not on substantive privacy grounds, but because Genting\u2019s judicial review was filed out of time and targeted what the court deemed a non-reviewable act. While the conflict between tax enforcement and personal data protection remains unresolved, the decision underscores a simple procedural truth: even strong claims can collapse if they miss the clock.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5895,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3035],"tags":[3680,3668,3679,3036,3678],"class_list":["post-5894","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-administrative","tag-administrative","tag-federal-court","tag-income-tax-act","tag-judicial-review","tag-pdpa"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT - TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Genting Malaysia Bhd [2025] 2 MLJ 822, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling that had favoured Genting&#039;s resistance to a personal data disclosure request. The appeal succeeded not on substantive privacy grounds, but because Genting\u2019s judicial review was filed out of time and targeted what the court deemed a non-reviewable act. While the conflict between tax enforcement and personal data protection remains unresolved, the decision underscores a simple procedural truth: even strong claims can collapse if they miss the clock.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ms_MY\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT - TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Genting Malaysia Bhd [2025] 2 MLJ 822, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling that had favoured Genting&#039;s resistance to a personal data disclosure request. The appeal succeeded not on substantive privacy grounds, but because Genting\u2019s judicial review was filed out of time and targeted what the court deemed a non-reviewable act. While the conflict between tax enforcement and personal data protection remains unresolved, the decision underscores a simple procedural truth: even strong claims can collapse if they miss the clock.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T15:28:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T15:28:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/dataprotection.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minit\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\"},\"headline\":\"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT &#8211; TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T15:28:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T15:28:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":439,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/dataprotection.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Administrative\",\"Federal Court\",\"Income Tax Act\",\"judicial review\",\"PDPA\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Administrative\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/\",\"name\":\"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT - TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/dataprotection.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T15:28:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T15:28:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"In Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Genting Malaysia Bhd [2025] 2 MLJ 822, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling that had favoured Genting's resistance to a personal data disclosure request. The appeal succeeded not on substantive privacy grounds, but because Genting\u2019s judicial review was filed out of time and targeted what the court deemed a non-reviewable act. While the conflict between tax enforcement and personal data protection remains unresolved, the decision underscores a simple procedural truth: even strong claims can collapse if they miss the clock.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/dataprotection.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/dataprotection.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT &#8211; TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"description\":\"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"width\":2080,\"height\":369,\"caption\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/yhalaw\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\",\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT - TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"In Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Genting Malaysia Bhd [2025] 2 MLJ 822, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling that had favoured Genting's resistance to a personal data disclosure request. The appeal succeeded not on substantive privacy grounds, but because Genting\u2019s judicial review was filed out of time and targeted what the court deemed a non-reviewable act. While the conflict between tax enforcement and personal data protection remains unresolved, the decision underscores a simple procedural truth: even strong claims can collapse if they miss the clock.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/","og_locale":"ms_MY","og_type":"article","og_title":"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT - TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","og_description":"In Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Genting Malaysia Bhd [2025] 2 MLJ 822, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling that had favoured Genting's resistance to a personal data disclosure request. The appeal succeeded not on substantive privacy grounds, but because Genting\u2019s judicial review was filed out of time and targeted what the court deemed a non-reviewable act. While the conflict between tax enforcement and personal data protection remains unresolved, the decision underscores a simple procedural truth: even strong claims can collapse if they miss the clock.","og_url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/","og_site_name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw","article_published_time":"2025-11-15T15:28:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-15T15:28:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/dataprotection.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"YHA Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"YHA Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minit"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/"},"author":{"name":"YHA Admin","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef"},"headline":"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT &#8211; TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING","datePublished":"2025-11-15T15:28:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T15:28:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/"},"wordCount":439,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/dataprotection.jpg","keywords":["Administrative","Federal Court","Income Tax Act","judicial review","PDPA"],"articleSection":["Administrative"],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/","name":"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT - TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/dataprotection.jpg","datePublished":"2025-11-15T15:28:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T15:28:40+00:00","description":"In Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Genting Malaysia Bhd [2025] 2 MLJ 822, the Court of Appeal overturned a High Court ruling that had favoured Genting's resistance to a personal data disclosure request. The appeal succeeded not on substantive privacy grounds, but because Genting\u2019s judicial review was filed out of time and targeted what the court deemed a non-reviewable act. While the conflict between tax enforcement and personal data protection remains unresolved, the decision underscores a simple procedural truth: even strong claims can collapse if they miss the clock.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ms-MY","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/dataprotection.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/dataprotection.jpg","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/personal-data-protection-act-too-late-too-light-gentings-data-privacy-challenge-fails-on-timing\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT &#8211; TOO LATE, TOO LIGHT: GENTING\u2019S DATA PRIVACY CHALLENGE FAILS ON TIMING"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization","name":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","width":2080,"height":369,"caption":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef","name":"YHA Admin","sameAs":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5894"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5894"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5894\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5896,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5894\/revisions\/5896"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5894"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5894"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5894"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}