{"id":5928,"date":"2025-11-16T00:35:00","date_gmt":"2025-11-15T16:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?p=5928"},"modified":"2025-11-16T00:35:04","modified_gmt":"2025-11-15T16:35:04","slug":"maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/","title":{"rendered":"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>1. Summary and Facts<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>In Lord Marine Co SA v Vimeksim SRB Doo [2025] 2 Lloyd&#8217;s Rep 52, Owners of MV Lord Hassan applied under s.44 Arbitration Act 1996 for an order permitting the sale of a cargo of Ukrainian corn over which they had exercised a contractual lien for unpaid freight. The charterparty lien and LMAA arbitration clause were incorporated into the bills of lading; the BLs were marked freight prepaid but freight had not, in fact, been paid, and the BLs remained in owners\u2019 hands. The cargo, discharged to a warehouse at Iskenderun, Turkey, was deteriorating rapidly. Charterers and receivers did not attend the hearing despite notice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>2. Legal Issues<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 Whether the cargo was \u201cthe subject of the proceedings\u201d so that the court had power under s.44(2) to order interim measures (including sale).<br>\u2022 Whether CPR 25.1 and s.44(3) enabled a sale of perishable\/rapidly deteriorating property pending arbitration.<br>\u2022 Effect of freight prepaid notation and the fact owners retained the BLs; whether any lawful BL holder could object; whether possession via receivers\u2019 warehouse affected the lien.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>3. Court\u2019s Findings<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 The English High Court ordered the sale of the cargo (with an undertaking in damages fortified for USD 75,000).<br>\u2022 The contractual lien was being exercised in support of the arbitral claim, making the cargo the \u201csubject of the proceedings\u201d under s.44(2), and the court could act as it would in legal proceedings. CPR 25.1 allowed an order for perishable property to be sold quickly.<br>\u2022 Evidence showed urgent risk of deterioration (self-heating, mould, infestation), justifying relief under s.44(3) even absent arbitral permission (which existed).<br>\u2022 Because owners retained the BLs, there was no lawful BL holder to object; the freight prepaid stamp did not create an estoppel where freight was in fact unpaid and the BLs never left owners\u2019 hands.<br>\u2022 Storage at the receivers\u2019 warehouse did not negate owners\u2019 possession: for these purposes receivers acted as owners\u2019 agent, so the lien continued.<br>\u2022 The lien could bind third-party cargo; otherwise a lien\u2019s utility would be undermined.<br>\u2022 Undertaking in damages was required and to be fortified for USD 75,000 (P&amp;I LoU or payment into solicitors\u2019 account).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>4. Practical Implications<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 S.44 AA 1996 remains a potent tool to preserve value where cargo under lien is deteriorating \u2014 the court may order interim sale pending LMAA arbitration.<br>\u2022 A \u201cfreight prepaid\u201d stamp will not estop owners if freight is unpaid and the BLs never left owners\u2019 possession.<br>\u2022 Possession and lien can subsist even when cargo sits in a receiver-owned warehouse if receivers act as owners\u2019 agent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Lord Marine Co Ltd v Vimeksim Trans SA &#038; Anor [2025] 2 Lloyd&#8217;s Rep 52, the English Commercial Court exercised its powers under s.44 Arbitration Act 1996 to order the sale of a deteriorating cargo of Ukrainian corn over which the shipowners had exercised a lien for unpaid freight. Mr Justice Bryan held that the cargo was the \u201csubject of the proceedings\u201d and that the court could intervene to preserve its value pending LMAA arbitration. The decision clarifies that a \u201cfreight prepaid\u201d stamp does not estop owners where freight has not actually been paid and the bills of lading never left owners\u2019 possession, and that possession can be maintained even when the cargo is stored in a receivers\u2019 warehouse. This case reinforces the court\u2019s readiness to act swiftly to prevent the loss of value in perishable cargo while safeguarding parties through fortified undertakings in damages.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5929,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1576],"tags":[1596,2799,3688,3689,1686],"class_list":["post-5928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-admiralty","tag-demurrage-detention-charges","tag-arbitration","tag-bills-of-lading","tag-maritime-lien","tag-shipping-law"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Lord Marine Co Ltd v Vimeksim Trans SA &amp; Anor [2025] 2 Lloyd&#039;s Rep 52, the English Commercial Court exercised its powers under s.44 Arbitration Act 1996 to order the sale of a deteriorating cargo of Ukrainian corn over which the shipowners had exercised a lien for unpaid freight. Mr Justice Bryan held that the cargo was the \u201csubject of the proceedings\u201d and that the court could intervene to preserve its value pending LMAA arbitration. The decision clarifies that a \u201cfreight prepaid\u201d stamp does not estop owners where freight has not actually been paid and the bills of lading never left owners\u2019 possession, and that possession can be maintained even when the cargo is stored in a receivers\u2019 warehouse. This case reinforces the court\u2019s readiness to act swiftly to prevent the loss of value in perishable cargo while safeguarding parties through fortified undertakings in damages.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ms_MY\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Lord Marine Co Ltd v Vimeksim Trans SA &amp; Anor [2025] 2 Lloyd&#039;s Rep 52, the English Commercial Court exercised its powers under s.44 Arbitration Act 1996 to order the sale of a deteriorating cargo of Ukrainian corn over which the shipowners had exercised a lien for unpaid freight. Mr Justice Bryan held that the cargo was the \u201csubject of the proceedings\u201d and that the court could intervene to preserve its value pending LMAA arbitration. The decision clarifies that a \u201cfreight prepaid\u201d stamp does not estop owners where freight has not actually been paid and the bills of lading never left owners\u2019 possession, and that possession can be maintained even when the cargo is stored in a receivers\u2019 warehouse. This case reinforces the court\u2019s readiness to act swiftly to prevent the loss of value in perishable cargo while safeguarding parties through fortified undertakings in damages.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T16:35:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T16:35:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/lienloss.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minit\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\"},\"headline\":\"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T16:35:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T16:35:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":424,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/lienloss.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Admiralty\",\"arbitration\",\"Bills of Lading\",\"Maritime Lien\",\"shipping law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Admiralty\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/\",\"name\":\"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/lienloss.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T16:35:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T16:35:04+00:00\",\"description\":\"In Lord Marine Co Ltd v Vimeksim Trans SA & Anor [2025] 2 Lloyd's Rep 52, the English Commercial Court exercised its powers under s.44 Arbitration Act 1996 to order the sale of a deteriorating cargo of Ukrainian corn over which the shipowners had exercised a lien for unpaid freight. Mr Justice Bryan held that the cargo was the \u201csubject of the proceedings\u201d and that the court could intervene to preserve its value pending LMAA arbitration. The decision clarifies that a \u201cfreight prepaid\u201d stamp does not estop owners where freight has not actually been paid and the bills of lading never left owners\u2019 possession, and that possession can be maintained even when the cargo is stored in a receivers\u2019 warehouse. This case reinforces the court\u2019s readiness to act swiftly to prevent the loss of value in perishable cargo while safeguarding parties through fortified undertakings in damages.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/lienloss.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/lienloss.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"description\":\"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"width\":2080,\"height\":369,\"caption\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/yhalaw\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\",\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"In Lord Marine Co Ltd v Vimeksim Trans SA & Anor [2025] 2 Lloyd's Rep 52, the English Commercial Court exercised its powers under s.44 Arbitration Act 1996 to order the sale of a deteriorating cargo of Ukrainian corn over which the shipowners had exercised a lien for unpaid freight. Mr Justice Bryan held that the cargo was the \u201csubject of the proceedings\u201d and that the court could intervene to preserve its value pending LMAA arbitration. The decision clarifies that a \u201cfreight prepaid\u201d stamp does not estop owners where freight has not actually been paid and the bills of lading never left owners\u2019 possession, and that possession can be maintained even when the cargo is stored in a receivers\u2019 warehouse. This case reinforces the court\u2019s readiness to act swiftly to prevent the loss of value in perishable cargo while safeguarding parties through fortified undertakings in damages.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/","og_locale":"ms_MY","og_type":"article","og_title":"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","og_description":"In Lord Marine Co Ltd v Vimeksim Trans SA & Anor [2025] 2 Lloyd's Rep 52, the English Commercial Court exercised its powers under s.44 Arbitration Act 1996 to order the sale of a deteriorating cargo of Ukrainian corn over which the shipowners had exercised a lien for unpaid freight. Mr Justice Bryan held that the cargo was the \u201csubject of the proceedings\u201d and that the court could intervene to preserve its value pending LMAA arbitration. The decision clarifies that a \u201cfreight prepaid\u201d stamp does not estop owners where freight has not actually been paid and the bills of lading never left owners\u2019 possession, and that possession can be maintained even when the cargo is stored in a receivers\u2019 warehouse. This case reinforces the court\u2019s readiness to act swiftly to prevent the loss of value in perishable cargo while safeguarding parties through fortified undertakings in damages.","og_url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/","og_site_name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw","article_published_time":"2025-11-15T16:35:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-15T16:35:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/lienloss.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"YHA Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"YHA Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minit"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/"},"author":{"name":"YHA Admin","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef"},"headline":"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO","datePublished":"2025-11-15T16:35:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T16:35:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/"},"wordCount":424,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/lienloss.jpg","keywords":["Admiralty","arbitration","Bills of Lading","Maritime Lien","shipping law"],"articleSection":["Admiralty"],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/","name":"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/lienloss.jpg","datePublished":"2025-11-15T16:35:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T16:35:04+00:00","description":"In Lord Marine Co Ltd v Vimeksim Trans SA & Anor [2025] 2 Lloyd's Rep 52, the English Commercial Court exercised its powers under s.44 Arbitration Act 1996 to order the sale of a deteriorating cargo of Ukrainian corn over which the shipowners had exercised a lien for unpaid freight. Mr Justice Bryan held that the cargo was the \u201csubject of the proceedings\u201d and that the court could intervene to preserve its value pending LMAA arbitration. The decision clarifies that a \u201cfreight prepaid\u201d stamp does not estop owners where freight has not actually been paid and the bills of lading never left owners\u2019 possession, and that possession can be maintained even when the cargo is stored in a receivers\u2019 warehouse. This case reinforces the court\u2019s readiness to act swiftly to prevent the loss of value in perishable cargo while safeguarding parties through fortified undertakings in damages.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ms-MY","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/lienloss.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/lienloss.jpg","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/maritime-law-lien-loss-and-lmaa-english-commercial-court-orders-sale-of-deteriorating-cargo\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"MARITIME LAW \u2013 LIEN, LOSS AND LMAA: ENGLISH COMMERCIAL COURT ORDERS SALE OF DETERIORATING CARGO"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization","name":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","width":2080,"height":369,"caption":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef","name":"YHA Admin","sameAs":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5928"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5928"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5928\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5930,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5928\/revisions\/5930"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5929"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}