{"id":5942,"date":"2025-11-16T07:52:47","date_gmt":"2025-11-15T23:52:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?p=5942"},"modified":"2025-11-16T07:59:41","modified_gmt":"2025-11-15T23:59:41","slug":"constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/","title":{"rendered":"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>1. Summary and Facts<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Ow Man Yaw &amp; Ors v Kementerian Dalam Negeri &amp; Anor [2024] 9 MLJ 77 concerns a dispute where the applicants, a married couple, sought Malaysian citizenship for a child under their custody. The child\u2019s original birth certificate recorded them as parents and citizen by birth at Sinova Medical Centre. However, investigations revealed that the applicants were not the biological parents, the birth was arranged through an agent for RM20,000, and the actual place of birth was unknown. A new birth certificate was issued stating the child was a non-citizen. Although the applicants later obtained an adoption order, subsequent birth certificates continued to record the child as non-citizen. The applicants then applied for citizenship under Article 15A but, receiving no response, filed the present motion seeking recognition of citizenship by operation of law under Article 14(1)(b) read with section 19B of the Second Schedule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>2. Legal Issues<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 Whether the child was found \u201cexposed\u201d or \u201cabandoned\u201d within the meaning of section 19B, Part III, Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution.<br>\u2022 Whether citizenship by operation of law under Article 14(1)(b) and section 19B could be invoked despite irregularities surrounding the child\u2019s origins and custody.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>3. Court\u2019s Findings<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>\u2022 The Court ruled in favor of the defendant, Kementerian Dalam Negeri &amp; Anor.<br>\u2022 Issue 1: The child was not \u201cabandoned\u201d but rather the subject of a planned arrangement involving the birth mother, doctor, agent and applicants amounting to child trading.<br>\u2022 Issue 2: As for Article 15A Federal Constitution, courts held that the decision rests solely with the Federal Government and not the judiciary.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Ow Man Yaw &#038; Ors v Kementerian Dalam Negeri &#038; Anor [2024] 9 MLJ 77, the High Court dismissed an application for Malaysian citizenship brought by adoptive parents on behalf of a child obtained through an agent. The Court held that the child was not \u201cabandoned\u201d within the meaning of section 19B of the Federal Constitution but was instead the subject of a planned arrangement amounting to child trading. As such, the presumption of citizenship by operation of law could not be invoked. The Court further affirmed that applications under Article 15A rest solely with the Federal Government, beyond judicial intervention. The ruling underscores that the best interests of the child cannot override constitutional requirements or validate unlawful conduct.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5943,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3581],"tags":[3437,3582,1705,3699,3036],"class_list":["post-5942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-constitutional-law","tag-citizenship","tag-constitutional-law","tag-family-law","tag-federal-constitution","tag-judicial-review"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Ow Man Yaw &amp; Ors v Kementerian Dalam Negeri &amp; Anor [2024] 9 MLJ 77, the High Court dismissed an application for Malaysian citizenship brought by adoptive parents on behalf of a child obtained through an agent. The Court held that the child was not \u201cabandoned\u201d within the meaning of section 19B of the Federal Constitution but was instead the subject of a planned arrangement amounting to child trading. As such, the presumption of citizenship by operation of law could not be invoked. The Court further affirmed that applications under Article 15A rest solely with the Federal Government, beyond judicial intervention. The ruling underscores that the best interests of the child cannot override constitutional requirements or validate unlawful conduct.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ms_MY\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Ow Man Yaw &amp; Ors v Kementerian Dalam Negeri &amp; Anor [2024] 9 MLJ 77, the High Court dismissed an application for Malaysian citizenship brought by adoptive parents on behalf of a child obtained through an agent. The Court held that the child was not \u201cabandoned\u201d within the meaning of section 19B of the Federal Constitution but was instead the subject of a planned arrangement amounting to child trading. As such, the presumption of citizenship by operation of law could not be invoked. The Court further affirmed that applications under Article 15A rest solely with the Federal Government, beyond judicial intervention. The ruling underscores that the best interests of the child cannot override constitutional requirements or validate unlawful conduct.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T23:52:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-11-15T23:59:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/citizen.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"630\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"YHA Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minit\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\"},\"headline\":\"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T23:52:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T23:59:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":269,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/citizen.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Citizenship\",\"Constitutional Law\",\"Family Law\",\"Federal Constitution\",\"judicial review\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Constitutional Law\"],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/\",\"name\":\"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/citizen.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-11-15T23:52:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-11-15T23:59:41+00:00\",\"description\":\"In Ow Man Yaw & Ors v Kementerian Dalam Negeri & Anor [2024] 9 MLJ 77, the High Court dismissed an application for Malaysian citizenship brought by adoptive parents on behalf of a child obtained through an agent. The Court held that the child was not \u201cabandoned\u201d within the meaning of section 19B of the Federal Constitution but was instead the subject of a planned arrangement amounting to child trading. As such, the presumption of citizenship by operation of law could not be invoked. The Court further affirmed that applications under Article 15A rest solely with the Federal Government, beyond judicial intervention. The ruling underscores that the best interests of the child cannot override constitutional requirements or validate unlawful conduct.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/citizen.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/11\\\/citizen.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":630},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm\",\"description\":\"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ms-MY\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2020\\\/06\\\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png\",\"width\":2080,\"height\":369,\"caption\":\"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/yhalaw\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef\",\"name\":\"YHA Admin\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/yhalaw.com.my\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"In Ow Man Yaw & Ors v Kementerian Dalam Negeri & Anor [2024] 9 MLJ 77, the High Court dismissed an application for Malaysian citizenship brought by adoptive parents on behalf of a child obtained through an agent. The Court held that the child was not \u201cabandoned\u201d within the meaning of section 19B of the Federal Constitution but was instead the subject of a planned arrangement amounting to child trading. As such, the presumption of citizenship by operation of law could not be invoked. The Court further affirmed that applications under Article 15A rest solely with the Federal Government, beyond judicial intervention. The ruling underscores that the best interests of the child cannot override constitutional requirements or validate unlawful conduct.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/","og_locale":"ms_MY","og_type":"article","og_title":"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","og_description":"In Ow Man Yaw & Ors v Kementerian Dalam Negeri & Anor [2024] 9 MLJ 77, the High Court dismissed an application for Malaysian citizenship brought by adoptive parents on behalf of a child obtained through an agent. The Court held that the child was not \u201cabandoned\u201d within the meaning of section 19B of the Federal Constitution but was instead the subject of a planned arrangement amounting to child trading. As such, the presumption of citizenship by operation of law could not be invoked. The Court further affirmed that applications under Article 15A rest solely with the Federal Government, beyond judicial intervention. The ruling underscores that the best interests of the child cannot override constitutional requirements or validate unlawful conduct.","og_url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/","og_site_name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw","article_published_time":"2025-11-15T23:52:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-11-15T23:59:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":630,"url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/citizen.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"YHA Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"YHA Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minit"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/"},"author":{"name":"YHA Admin","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef"},"headline":"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING","datePublished":"2025-11-15T23:52:47+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T23:59:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/"},"wordCount":269,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/citizen.jpg","keywords":["Citizenship","Constitutional Law","Family Law","Federal Constitution","judicial review"],"articleSection":["Constitutional Law"],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/","name":"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING | Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/citizen.jpg","datePublished":"2025-11-15T23:52:47+00:00","dateModified":"2025-11-15T23:59:41+00:00","description":"In Ow Man Yaw & Ors v Kementerian Dalam Negeri & Anor [2024] 9 MLJ 77, the High Court dismissed an application for Malaysian citizenship brought by adoptive parents on behalf of a child obtained through an agent. The Court held that the child was not \u201cabandoned\u201d within the meaning of section 19B of the Federal Constitution but was instead the subject of a planned arrangement amounting to child trading. As such, the presumption of citizenship by operation of law could not be invoked. The Court further affirmed that applications under Article 15A rest solely with the Federal Government, beyond judicial intervention. The ruling underscores that the best interests of the child cannot override constitutional requirements or validate unlawful conduct.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ms-MY","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/citizen.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/citizen.jpg","width":1200,"height":630},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/constitutional-law-citizenship-citizenship-denied-high-court-refuses-to-legalise-child-trading\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"CONSTITUTIONAL LAW \u2013 CITIZENSHIP \u2013 CITIZENSHIP DENIED: HIGH COURT REFUSES TO LEGALISE CHILD TRADING"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#website","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","name":"Yew Huoi, How &amp; Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm","description":"YHA Law Firm is a leading law firm in Malaysia.Specialises in handling Civil,Maritime,Shipping Matters,Company Law,Family Law,Real Estate and many more","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"ms-MY"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#organization","name":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ms-MY","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/YHA-Law-Logo-White-BG-New@2x-e1668772571446.png","width":2080,"height":369,"caption":"Yew Huoi, How & Associates Law Firm | yhalaw.com.my"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/yhalaw"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/#\/schema\/person\/f778c60834a29c5ec215ab62d3207bef","name":"YHA Admin","sameAs":["https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5942"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5942"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5942\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5948,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5942\/revisions\/5948"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/yhalaw.com.my\/my\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}