Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm

FAMILY LAW – CUSTOMARY MARRIAGE – NOT REGISTERED – SOCSO

Whether a customarily married wife is entitled to Social Security Organization (‘Socso’) benefits when such marriage was not registered under the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (“LRA 1976”).

Yes.

  • There is no definition of widow in the Socso legislation. However, the word dependant in section 2(3) Employees’ Social Security Act 1969 (“ESSA 1969”) includes a widow. Dependent is entitled to the survivor’s pension.
  • Dependant’ in ESSA 1969 does not expressly say ‘widow’ must be married and registered under the LRA 1976.
  • The Parliament had amended the definition of dependant in section 2(3) ESSA in 2012. The requirement of registration was not inserted.
  • If Parliament had intended to insert the mandatory registration for non-Muslim marriages in the definition section for the word dependent, the Parliament would have done so. The Parliament did not.
  • Section 2 of the Married Women Act 1957 (“MMA 1957”) provides “married woman” includes any woman married in accordance with the rites and ceremonies required by her religion, manners or customs.
  • As such, both women who are registered under the LRA and customarily married are entitled to the Socso survivor’s pension as the widow of deceased.

Case in Point: Ketua Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial v Wong Ton Feng [2020] 12 MLJ 625. Shah Alam High Court civil appeal no BA-16-17-06 of 2019

Whether a widow can claim for Employment Provident Fund (‘EPF’)?

  • Upon the death of an EPF member, the EPF amount is paid to the nominee that was nominated by the EPF member.
  • In other words, so long as the husband appointed his wife (regardless registered or not registered) to receive and oversee his EPF savings in the event of his demise, the wife can claim for the EPF pension after his death.

Recent Post

NAVIGATION AND SHIPPING LAW – COLLISION REGULATIONS – COLLISION AT SEA – A WAKE-UP CALL FOR ADHERING TO NAVIGATION RULES

The collision between the FMG Sydney and MSC Apollo highlights the critical importance of adhering to established navigation rules. Deviations, delayed actions, and reliance on radio communications instead of clear, early maneuvers can lead to disastrous outcomes. This case serves as a stark reminder for mariners: follow the rules, act decisively, and prioritize safety above assumptions.

Read More »

SHIPPING AND ADMIRALTY IN REM – A SINKING ASSET – COURT ORDERS SALE OF ARRESTED VESSEL TO PRESERVE CLAIM SECURITY

In a landmark admiralty decision, the High Court ordered the pendente lite sale of the arrested vessel Shi Pu 1, emphasizing the principle of preserving claim security over the defendant’s financial incapacity. The court ruled that the vessel, deemed a “wasting asset,” could not remain under arrest indefinitely without proper maintenance or security. This case reinforces the necessity for shipowners to manage arrested assets proactively to prevent significant financial and legal repercussions.

Read More »

EMPLOYMENT LAW – IS DIRECTOR A DIRECTOR OR EMPLOYEE? UNPACKING DUAL ROLES IN EMPLOYMENT LAW

The Court of Appeal clarified the dual roles of directors as both shareholders and employees, affirming that executive directors can qualify as “workmen” under the Industrial Relations Act 1967. The decision emphasizes that removal as a director does not equate to lawful dismissal as an employee unless due process is followed. This case highlights the importance of distinguishing shareholder rights from employment protections, ensuring companies navigate such disputes with clarity and fairness.

Read More »

COMMERCIAL CONTRACT – FORCE MAJEURE OR JUST EXCUSES? LESSONS FROM LITASCO V DER MOND OIL [2024] 2 LLOYD’S REP 593

The recent decision in Litasco SA v Der Mond Oil and Gas Africa SA [2024] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 593 highlights the strict thresholds required to invoke defences such as force majeure and trade sanctions in commercial disputes. The English Commercial Court dismissed claims of misrepresentation and found that banking restrictions and sanctions did not excuse payment obligations under the crude oil contract. This judgment reinforces the importance of precise contractual drafting and credible evidence in defending against payment claims, serving as a cautionary tale for businesses navigating international trade and legal obligations.

Read More »

SHIPPING – LETTER OF CREDIT – LESSONS FROM UNICREDIT’S FRAUD CLAIM AGAINST GLENCORE

The Singapore Court of Appeal’s decision in Unicredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd [2024] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 624 reaffirms the principle of autonomy in letters of credit and highlights the high evidentiary threshold for invoking the fraud exception. Unicredit’s claim of deceit was dismissed as the court found no evidence of false representations by Glencore, emphasizing that banks deal with documents, not underlying transactions. This case serves as a critical reminder for international trade practitioners to prioritize clear documentation and robust due diligence to mitigate risks in financial transactions.

Read More »

LAND LAW – PROPERTY SOLD TWICE: OWNERSHIP NOT TRANSFERRED IN FIRST SALE

This legal update examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in Malayan Banking Bhd v Mohd Affandi bin Ahmad & Anor [2024] 1 MLJ 1, which reaffirmed the binding nature of valid Sale and Purchase Agreements (SPAs) and the establishment of constructive trust. The court dismissed claims of deferred indefeasibility by subsequent purchasers and a chargee bank, emphasizing the critical importance of due diligence in property transactions. The decision serves as a cautionary tale for financial institutions and vendors, reinforcing the need for meticulous compliance with legal and equitable obligations.

Read More »
en_USEN
× Contact Us