Yew Huoi, How & Associates | Leading Malaysia Law Firm

REVENUE LAW – INCOME TAX

Smith is a director for Company X in the year of 2003. In 2022, the government claimed unpaid tax against Company X and Smith. The government claimed that Company X and Smith are jointly and severally liable for outstanding tax due by the company for the year of assessment (“YA”) 2001 – 2004.

Q: Is Smith responsible for the tax due by the company for YAs 2001-2004? 

A: Not entirely correct. Smith is only responsible for tax of the company after he became a director. And in this case, only for YA 2004. Although the Income Tax Act of 1967 (ITA) says directors can be held jointly and severally responsible for a company’s tax liabilities, it is impractical, ineffective, and unjust to impose this obligation before Smith became a director.

Q: Can Smith be liable for tax after 6 years?

A: No. Section 106(1) of the ITA says “(t)ax due and payable may be recovered by the Government by civil proceedings as a debt due to the Government.” However, s. 106(1) is still subject to the Limitations Act 1953. There is a six-year statute of limitation. The government can no longer claim unpaid tax due after 6 years. And in this case, the alleged unpaid tax was 17 years ago.

Recent Post

COMPLIANCE AND CONSEQUENCES UNDER SECTION 348 OF THE COMPANIES ACT 2016

This legal update addresses the critical importance of complying with procedural requirements under Section 348 of the Companies Act 2016 in statutory derivative actions. It highlights the consequences of failing to provide mandatory notice and the necessity of naming alleged wrongdoer directors in the leave application, which could result in the Leave Order being set aside.

Read More »
en_USEN
× Contact Us