INSOLVENCY ACT 1967 – A FRESH FINANCIAL START: THE EVOLUTION OF BANKRUPTCY PROVISIONS IN MALAYSIA’S INSOLVENCY ACT

The main intent of the recent amendment to Insolvency Act which came into force on 6.10.2023 is to provide individuals with a chance for a new beginning. Everyone can encounter financial difficulties and these updated provisions aim to ensure that a person facing bankruptcy is not perpetually weighed down by prior financial missteps or unexpected hurdles.

Introduction

  • Bankruptcy in Malaysia is governed by the Insolvency Act 1967 which recent amendment has come into force on 6.10.2023.
  • A person can be made a bankruptcy by a court order if they are unable to pay their debts of RM100,000.00 and above.
  • There are several ways a bankruptcy may be discharged as follows:
  • Annulment;
  • Application to court;
  • Discharge by Director General of Insolvency (“DGI”); and
  • Completion of Bankruptcy Duration of 3 Years from the Date of Submission of Statement of Affairs (Automatic Discharge)

Annulment

  • Happens when the bankruptcy order should not have been made in the first place or when the debt is paid in full.

Application to Court

  • An application to court can be filed at any time after he is being adjudged bankrupt.
  • The application must be supported by a report from the DGI as to the bankrupt’s conduct and affairs.
  • When considering the application, the court will weigh between the rights of creditors to recover their debt with the bankrupt individual’s opportunity for a fresh start, taking into account the broader interest of public commercial reality.
  • Several key factors will be taken into consideration:
    • The bankrupt’s age and earnings;
    • Health conditions;
    • Length of time of the bankruptcy;
    • Reason leading to bankruptcy;
    • The proportion of debt settled;
    • Behaviour of the bankrupt;
    • Actions of the creditors; and/or
    • The count of creditors in opposition.

    Discharge through DGI

    • Starting 1.10.2003, the DGI is granted the authority to discharge when there is an application by the bankrupt.
    • This application can be submitted after a duration of 5 years after the date of the bankruptcy order.

    Completion of Bankruptcy Duration of 3 Years from the Date of Submission of Statement of Affairs (Automatic Discharge)

    • This is introduced in the Insolvency (Amendment) Act 2023 (Act A1695) which came into force on 6.10.2023.
    • A bankrupt is automatically discharge on the expiration of 3 years from the date of the submission of the Statement of Affairs if the bankrupt has complied with all obligations and there is no objection from the creditors.
    • Application for objection by the creditor(s) must be filed in the court.

    Recent Post

    NAVIGATING THE INTERSECTION OF ARBITRATION AND LITIGATION

    Explore the delicate balance between court proceedings and arbitration in our latest legal update, focusing on a pivotal case where a request to file a defense leads to a significant legal debate on the appropriate forum for dispute resolution. Gain insights from key cases that define when to push for arbitration over litigation.

    Read More »

    FAMILY LAW – DIVORCE – REDEFINING SPOUSAL SUPPORT – FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE IN DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS

    A divorce case involving two insurance agents raises crucial questions about spousal maintenance for financially independent women and their shared responsibility in child support. The court will assess each party’s financial capacity and contributions, considering modern principles of gender equality and the ‘means and needs’ test under the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976.

    Read More »

    JUDICIAL REVIEW – PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND LOCUS STANDI

    This excerpt illuminates the foundational principles of judicial review as outlined in Order 53 of the Rules of Court 2012. It highlights the criteria for challenging public decisions on grounds of illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety. Central to the discussion is the question of timing in judicial review applications, particularly in cases of procedural unfairness. The practical scenario underscores the significance of a “decision” by the relevant authority as a prerequisite for locus standi, drawing insights from the case of Hisham bin Halim v Maya bt Ahmad Fuad & Ors [2023] 12 MLJ 714.

    Read More »

    CONTRACT LAW – CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION REMEDIES UNVEILED: DECIPHERING CONTRACTUAL CLAUSES AND LEGAL BALANCE

    This legal updates explore the principles governing the interpretation of agreements, emphasizing the importance of clarity and unambiguity in contractual terms. It delves into a key issue involving restrictions on remedies for breach of contract, shedding light on the court’s commitment to upholding plain meanings. The illustrative scenario involving shareholders X and Y dissects a pertinent clause, showcasing the delicate balance between restricting remedies and ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.

    Read More »

    TIME’S UP: NAVIGATING THE 12-YEAR LIMITATION

    In the intricate dance of land security and loan agreements, the ticking clock of the limitation period cannot be ignored. This excerpt delves into the critical understanding of how the 12-year limitation period, as prescribed by the Limitation Act 1953, plays a pivotal role in the enforcement of property charges in Malaysia. It elucidates the start time of this countdown and its legal implications, providing a comprehensive guide for both lenders and borrowers in navigating these time-sensitive waters.

    Read More »
    en_USEN
    × Contact Us