ADMIRALTY – MARINE INSURANCE – CONTRIBUTION AND INDEMNITY
ABC insurance company rejected B’s claim for cargo damage. Unhappy with the rejection, B sued ABC insurance company and the ship owner who carries its goods for negligence.
News and Updates
ABC insurance company rejected B’s claim for cargo damage. Unhappy with the rejection, B sued ABC insurance company and the ship owner who carries its goods for negligence.
What is the significance of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) to the maritime industry in Malaysia?
Parties who must adhere to International Conventions on Maritime
Labor and the method of enforcement practiced in Malaysia.
The Hague-Visby Rules were recently on 15.7.2021 incorporated to replace the Hague Rules used in Malaysia. However, not all the provisions in Hague-Visby Rules apply. The following table will set out the relevant changes made in the amended COGSA.
When will an arrested vessel become a wasting asset? An analysis of the condition on MV Yih Shen, one of the first few vessels sold by the court in a judicial sale pendente lite proceeding.
What is Admiralty Sheriff’s expenses? Who pays the Sheriff’s Expenses? The pitfall of Admiralty arrest.
What is maritime lien? What type of claim is classed as Maritime Lien? What is the significant of having a maritime lien?
What can a bank do if a mortgagor cease to pay his/her loan vested in a ship? Can I invoke an admiralty writ in rem in High Court of Malaya but serve and execute them in the High Court of Sabah & Sarawak?
What are demurrage and detention and whether they are charges valid under the shipping law in Malaysia?
This update delves into a case where two individuals received substantial sentences for their roles in a violent home invasion, highlighting the judicial rationale behind consecutive sentences and the balance between public safety and offender rehabilitation.
This legal update examines the complexities of issuing bankruptcy notices on judgments older than six years, highlighting the necessity of obtaining court leave under Order 46 rule 2(1)(a).
This legal update addresses the critical importance of complying with procedural requirements under Section 348 of the Companies Act 2016 in statutory derivative actions. It highlights the consequences of failing to provide mandatory notice and the necessity of naming alleged wrongdoer directors in the leave application, which could result in the Leave Order being set aside.