FAMILY LAW – CUSTOMARY MARRIAGE – NOT REGISTERED – SOCSO

Whether a customarily married wife is entitled to Social Security Organization (‘Socso’) benefits when such marriage was not registered under the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (“LRA 1976”).

Yes.

  • There is no definition of widow in the Socso legislation. However, the word dependant in section 2(3) Employees’ Social Security Act 1969 (“ESSA 1969”) includes a widow. Dependent is entitled to the survivor’s pension.
  • Dependant’ in ESSA 1969 does not expressly say ‘widow’ must be married and registered under the LRA 1976.
  • The Parliament had amended the definition of dependant in section 2(3) ESSA in 2012. The requirement of registration was not inserted.
  • If Parliament had intended to insert the mandatory registration for non-Muslim marriages in the definition section for the word dependent, the Parliament would have done so. The Parliament did not.
  • Section 2 of the Married Women Act 1957 (“MMA 1957”) provides “married woman” includes any woman married in accordance with the rites and ceremonies required by her religion, manners or customs.
  • As such, both women who are registered under the LRA and customarily married are entitled to the Socso survivor’s pension as the widow of deceased.

Case in Point: Ketua Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial v Wong Ton Feng [2020] 12 MLJ 625. Shah Alam High Court civil appeal no BA-16-17-06 of 2019

Whether a widow can claim for Employment Provident Fund (‘EPF’)?

  • Upon the death of an EPF member, the EPF amount is paid to the nominee that was nominated by the EPF member.
  • In other words, so long as the husband appointed his wife (regardless registered or not registered) to receive and oversee his EPF savings in the event of his demise, the wife can claim for the EPF pension after his death.

Recent Post

NAVIGATING THE INTERSECTION OF ARBITRATION AND LITIGATION

Explore the delicate balance between court proceedings and arbitration in our latest legal update, focusing on a pivotal case where a request to file a defense leads to a significant legal debate on the appropriate forum for dispute resolution. Gain insights from key cases that define when to push for arbitration over litigation.

Read More »

FAMILY LAW – DIVORCE – REDEFINING SPOUSAL SUPPORT – FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE IN DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS

A divorce case involving two insurance agents raises crucial questions about spousal maintenance for financially independent women and their shared responsibility in child support. The court will assess each party’s financial capacity and contributions, considering modern principles of gender equality and the ‘means and needs’ test under the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976.

Read More »

JUDICIAL REVIEW – PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND LOCUS STANDI

This excerpt illuminates the foundational principles of judicial review as outlined in Order 53 of the Rules of Court 2012. It highlights the criteria for challenging public decisions on grounds of illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety. Central to the discussion is the question of timing in judicial review applications, particularly in cases of procedural unfairness. The practical scenario underscores the significance of a “decision” by the relevant authority as a prerequisite for locus standi, drawing insights from the case of Hisham bin Halim v Maya bt Ahmad Fuad & Ors [2023] 12 MLJ 714.

Read More »

CONTRACT LAW – CONTRACTUAL INTERPRETATION REMEDIES UNVEILED: DECIPHERING CONTRACTUAL CLAUSES AND LEGAL BALANCE

This legal updates explore the principles governing the interpretation of agreements, emphasizing the importance of clarity and unambiguity in contractual terms. It delves into a key issue involving restrictions on remedies for breach of contract, shedding light on the court’s commitment to upholding plain meanings. The illustrative scenario involving shareholders X and Y dissects a pertinent clause, showcasing the delicate balance between restricting remedies and ensuring fairness in legal proceedings.

Read More »

TIME’S UP: NAVIGATING THE 12-YEAR LIMITATION

In the intricate dance of land security and loan agreements, the ticking clock of the limitation period cannot be ignored. This excerpt delves into the critical understanding of how the 12-year limitation period, as prescribed by the Limitation Act 1953, plays a pivotal role in the enforcement of property charges in Malaysia. It elucidates the start time of this countdown and its legal implications, providing a comprehensive guide for both lenders and borrowers in navigating these time-sensitive waters.

Read More »
en_USEN
× Contact Us